Showing posts with label theory of constraints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theory of constraints. Show all posts

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Science applied to People Management | Science applied to Human Resources

Managing people is still one of the toughest things we do.  (Click video link below.)
 A friend (hi Kathy) recently sent me this video that addresses the science of managing people /human resouces and ourselves (my take). The reason she sent it was because my personality is similar to the presentor -- at least in her opinion.
 And, I have to admit I really related both to the personality (a lot) and to the subject matter. 

 Anyway, I thought this video was really good. It seems very consistent with Theory of Constraints and fills a gap. 
 
It's only 20 minutes, so check it out: 

After you watch it, leave me a comment and let me know what you think!

Wishing you success,
Dr Lisa

President, Science of Business


2011 Copyright, Science of Business. All rights reserved.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

The Toilet Paper Roll--Does It Change Itself? (A Theory of Constraints Lesson)

The answer is no, not yet, at least that I have seen. So we need a process ...



I have a process for making sure that we are never without toilet paper in any bathroom. Yes, it is a process. Toilet paper rolls do not just magically appear under the sink.


I use a 2 bin system.


Whenever the last roll is taken from the cabinet underneath the sink, leaving just the roll on the holder – that is the signal to retrieve 2 more rolls from storage and put them in the cabinet.


And, here’s the really complicated part. When you remove the last rolls from storage, this is the indication to put “toilet paper” on the shopping list. And the shopping list, of course, is in its standard location with pen for easy, quick additions. (So don’t move it or take the pen.)


Now this process is simple and elegant BUT despite that, it still does not work 100% of the time.


So what does a Theory of Constraints expert do when a process is not working? We collect the reasons why. We then use the biggest occurrence of why’s to improve the process.


The most frequently occurring why I’ve collected so far is “I’m too busy to go replenish toilet paper at the time I pull the last from under the sink.”


So to continue down the process improvement path we have to figure out how to deal with this biggest disruption to our toilet paper supply. 


What are your ideas?


This is an example of a Theory of Constraints POOGI process, a Process of On-Going Improvement. And it is a critical part of any system. We use it in the Velocity Scheduling System (our scheduling program for custom job shops).


How can you apply this to one of YOUR processes?

Share your comments, feedback and suggestions by leaving a comment on this post.  Really -- I want to hear from you!

Wishing you success,
Dr Lisa
President, Science of Business

P.S. FOR CUSTOM JOB SHOPS ONLY: The next Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program for custom job shop scheduling and machine shop scheduling starts on Monday June 6.



P.P.S. Ready to increase sales? Need a Mafia Offer? The ON-LINE Mafia Offer Boot Camp is open for registration!

2011 Copyright, Science of Business.  All rights reserved.

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Your “To-Do” List May BE the Problem! A Theory of Constraints Lesson

You know that song by Sugarland called All I Want To Do? There’s a line in it that goes something like “I got better things to do than my to do list anyway …”



Every time I hear that I just think – then you’re not doing your “to do” list correctly!


I know, I know – I’m weird. But, I think it’s true for a lot of people.


The traditional way of making a “to do” list is to brain storm all the things we need to do. But that is NOT how we do it in Theory of Constraints (TOC).


To make sure that you don’t have better things to do than your “to do” list, don’t use the brain storming method. Instead, understand what you’re trying to achieve and ask “What’s keeping me from that?”


List each obstacle to your goal, the result you’re after or to completing your project (depending on your situation). What it takes to overcome each of those obstacles is what you want on your “to do” list. That way you are only doing what needs to be done to get the result and aren’t getting side tracked by doing (or procrastinating doing) what really isn’t necessary to get the result.


In this way you will end up with a list of things “to do” that, when completed, should be getting you closer to your goal or whatever it was that you’re trying to achieve.


Too often when we brain storm, we put “to dos” that really are NOT needed to get the result we are after. This just delays the result.


Can you think of a time you brain stormed a “to do” item that really didn’t need to be done? Let me know by leaving a comment on this post.

 
Wishing you success.,


Dr Lisa
President, Science of Business

P.S. For those of you keeping score at home this is part of the Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes and it's how we build a Prerequisite Tree (PrT).

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Live from the eye of the storm (a Theory of Constraints lesson)

"Now let's go live to Suzy who is reporting live from the level 5 hurricane... Suzy, how is it out there?"

storm4.jpg
"Well Bob, I can barely stand up as I'm getting pelted with hail in 70 mile per hour winds.  I hope you can hear me because I can't see the camera man 2 feet in front of me.  Things are pretty crazy out here; the entire area has been evacuated.  I expect to be completely blown off my feet any minute, so back to you Bob." 
storm11.jpg
"Thanks Suzy, stay safe out there.  Now, in other news ..."

Have you ever noticed that every network that reports the weather also reports it "live from the eye of the storm"?  I have even seen this live reporting watching the news in China and Thailand too.  I did not understand a thing during the news, except when they were reporting "live from the eye of the storm". 
 
I said to Brad - hey look they're reporting "live from the eye of the storm" here too.  We mused over the way the warm dry newscaster interacts with the reporter that puts their life in danger.  

Well, the week before last I finally heard about a limitation to this kind of live reporting.  Evidently it's nuclear radiation.  Many stations told their reporters to stay at least 50 miles away from the troubled nuclear reactors in Japan.  I was relieved.  

But before they decided to pull back, reporters were right in the thick of things.  It seems to me that if nuclear radiation is where you draw the line, you would know that right from the start.  (NOTE:  they may have had a trigger for pulling the reporters back, I don't know.  It just didn't seem that way.)

Deciding after the fact can be problematic.  You might try to stick with the current approach, policy or plan for too long.  But, if you know what would cause a change of plan, you'll identify the need for the change and then change faster.  

Now I realize that you can't predict everything, but many things can be predicted.  For example, what will you do, how will you handle these situations in your business:
  • You lose 25% of you business in 1 day.  (heaven forbid, knock on wood)
  • A customer threatens not to pay $750,000 in products or services.
  • You get sued.
  • You way oversell your capacity.
  • You work through your entire backlog (while sales remained constant) because you're using the Velocity Scheduling System or Project Velocity System.
  • You're NOT going into the red zone of the buffer anymore which is slowing your ability to continuously improve.  (Remember we expect to go into the red zone of the buffer about 5% of the time so that we can collect those whys and identify our biggest disruption to flow so we can identify our one and only improvement project.)
  • And, what's your trigger to go out with your mafia offer - how will you know when your operations are ready?
 What is your list?  You don't have to get crazy, the first 3 I listed above, I hope, are very unlikely to happen to you.  The remaining items, though, may be more probable since they are negatives due to success.  So what things are most likely to happen at some point?  Then starting with the highest probability one, how could you prevent or best deal with each?

 By doing this exercise, you will be improving your systems and processes to protect against any negatives from success and from stagnation.  This will make your company more viable and more able to handle growth.  

In Theory of Constraints (TOC) this is called coming up with your Negative Branch Reservations.  We like to do this NBR analysis whenever we're going to make a change/improvement.  But most of us don't take the time to do this.  In particular, I very rarely see that clients have prepared for their negative branches to SUCCESS.  So basically I'm suggesting you do this now. 

 For example , if you don't know what your trigger is for shortening your buffer, it may not get shortened (or shortened fast enough) and your continuous improvement may be stalled.  But if instead you include in your SOP that when we've had 1 month of 1% or less stuff going into the red zone we are going to shorten our buffer -- now you know, and chances are it will get done and done quickly.  (something we do in the Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program -- scheduling for custom job shop)

 I'm just suggesting a little preparation instead of waiting until the reporter's hair is falling out and deciding that you should have pulled out sooner (not that that happened).  

 How many people do you know that did not react fast enough in the 2008-2009 down turn?  How many of those did not live to fight another day?  What are YOU doing to make your company more viable to ensure you can take market share during the next downturn?

 Remember -- hope is not a strategy.  

 Let me know what you think, by leaving a comment on this post.    

Wishing you success.,
Dr Lisa
President, Science of Business

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Your constraint is ...

I spent this last week with Dr Eliyahu Goldratt. As many of you know I used to work for him as his Global Marketing Director. He invited me to come and check out what he’s been working on. So, here’s my take on it …



One of the key differences in his thinking is that management attention is the constraint.


While your bottleneck may move around, the only reason it moves or that you even have an internal bottleneck is because either 1) you’re not paying attention; and/or 2) you’re not focused on dealing with it; and/or 3) you’re not taking the right actions.


So the issue is one of focus (at least initially). Most management teams are not working on the right things and waste a lot of time doing what really doesn’t make a difference, most of which doesn’t need to be done.


A management team will be effective if they do the things that need to be done and don’t waste time doing what doesn’t need to be done, shouldn’t be done or multi-tasking between too many things. Doing the latter is what consumes all your time and leaves you little or no time to do what should be and needs to be done.


That is all really easy to say, but harder to execute.

Let’s say that we ARE paying attention and that we ARE focused. Now all we have to do is to take the right actions. Piece of cake, right?

No.

… because the action that you think is the right action typically is not. If you’ve been studying Theory of Constraints for a while or reading my stuff for a while you know that our intuition about what specifically to go and do is often WRONG.

Here are just 4 examples:



So, here’s my advice.


1. Understand what you need to be focused on to meet your goals. I’m assuming that you ARE clear on your goal.


2. Focus on that and nothing else (stop multi-tasking and stop your people from multi-tasking).


3. Get’er done, one tactic at time.


If you are not sure of any or all of these – get yourself one of those TOC consultant types. A good TOC expert can get you focused, help you figure out how to stay focused, and get you set up with the right strategy and tactics (specific actions to take) to achieve the results you’re after.


And the return on this investment should be fast and substantial. If you are not sure what your next step should be, contact me for a free 1 hour strategy session. There’s no charge, we’ll see if we can get you pointed in the right direction.



Wishing you success,


Dr Lisa


President, Science of Business, and your favorite TOC Consultant type!

P.S. FOR CUSTOM JOB SHOPS ONLY: The next Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program starting soon!


P.P.S. Ready to increase sales? You need a Mafia Offer? The ON-LINE Mafia Offer Boot Camp is open for registration!
 
2011 Copyright, Science of Business.  All rights reserved.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Theory of Constraints Lesson on Evaluating an Idea

This text is from a county emergency manager in Minot, North Dakota


WEATHER BULLETIN

Up here in the Northern part of North Dakota we just recovered from a Historic event --- may I even say a "Weather Event" of "Biblical Proportions" --- with a historic blizzard of up to 25’ of snow and winds to 50 MPH that broke trees in half, knocked down utility poles, stranded hundreds of motorists in lethal snow banks, closed ALL roads, isolated scores of communities and cut power to 10 ' s of thousands.



FYI:

Obama did not come.

FEMA did nothing.

No one howled for the government.

No one blamed the government.

No one even uttered an expletive on TV.

Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton did not visit.

Our Mayors did not blame Obama or anyone else.

Our Governor did not blame Obama or anyone else either.

CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, or NBC did not visit - or even report on this category 5 snow storm.


Nobody demanded $2,000 debit cards.

No one asked for a FEMA Trailer House.

No one looted.

Nobody - I mean Nobody demanded the government do something.

Nobody expected the government to do anything either.

No Larry King, No Bill O ' Reilly, No Oprah, No Chris Mathews and No Geraldo Rivera.

No Shaun Penn, No Barbara Streisand, No Brad Pitts, No Hollywood types to be found.


Nope, we just melted the snow for water.

Sent out caravans of SUV 's to pluck people out of snow engulfed cars.

The truck drivers pulled people out of snow banks and didn’t ' t ask for a penny.

Local restaurants made food, and the police and fire departments delivered it to the snow bound families..

Families took in the stranded people - total strangers.


We fired up wood stoves, broke out coal oil lanterns or Coleman lanterns.

We put on an extra layers of clothes because up here it is "Work or Die".

We did not wait for some affirmative action government to get us out of a mess created by being immobilized by a welfare program that trades votes for ' sitting at home ' checks.

Even though a Category 5 blizzard of this scale is not usual, we know it can happen and how to deal with it ourselves.


I hope this gets passed on.

Maybe ......

SOME people will get the message ......

The world does Not owe you a living.

12/29/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn’t this interesting?  I don't know if it's really true, that it was sent by an emergency manager in North Dakota, but I love the message.


Now for the Theory of Constraints lesson …


If you were in charge of emergency management for your county how would you prepare?


In Theory of Constraints, one of the things we use to prepare is the phenomenal human ability to find anything and everything wrong with an idea. We call it the “yes, but”.


Whenever we are presented with an idea or solution that did not originate in our own heads, we think and sometimes say “yes, but …”.


We are saying yes to part of the solution, BUT we have a concern about another part of the solution or about a negative that we think could result.


And in some cases the “yes, but” could be the result of our misunderstanding of the solution.


But in any case, and in many company cultures saying it out loud is frowned upon, at least depending on whose idea it was. So many “yes, buts …” never get verbalized.


What a shame and what a missed opportunity!


We use the “yes, buts” technique in the Velocity Scheduling System and our Mafia Offer Boot Camp.


“Yes, buts” can clear up miss understandings, improve already good solutions and help you to find a solution for what seems like an impossible situation.


So if you were in charge of emergency management, would you encourage “yes, buts”? Would you follow every potential negative to see where it leads and determine if it’s worth being prepared for?


I think you would. So why not do that as you're making decisions in your company? Why not make voicing “yes, buts” a positive thing?


Let me know what you think, by leaving a comment on this post.   


And you may also want to check out this related article:
http://drlisamaxprofit.blogspot.com/2009/12/theory-of-constraints-poogi-part-53-yes.html


Dr Lisa Lang
President, Science of Business
 
2011 Copyright, Science of Business.  All rights reserved.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Theory of Constraints Cloud Thinking Process Tool 4 Conflict Resolution

I just completed my first Stompernet faculty office hour where I covered the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process tool called the Cloud or the Evaporating Cloud.  The cloud is used to understand the root cause of undesirable effects and/or conflicts.

While the cloud is part of the complete Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes, it is also a very useful stand alone tool.  You can use this quick reference guide to get you started. 

Here is the one page overview I created for quick reference:  http://budurl.com/cloudsum

If you want a book on the subject, here's a couple that I recommend:
Thinking for a Change by Lisa J. Scheinkopf.
The Logical Thinking Process by H. William Dettmer (Bill Dettmer)

And in this one, Dr Goldratt talks about how to think and why clear thinking is so important:
The Choice by Eliyahu M Goldratt  (it's a novel)

If you want to be notified when the video is ready, sign up for the Theory of Constraints Ask Dr Lisa newsletter, here:  http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/free-stuff/free-newsletter.aspx

Here's to Maximizing Your Profits!

Dr Lisa
(c)Copyright 2010, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

7 Synergies for Business Success -- Dr Lisa interviews Pam Watson Korbel

I interviewd Pam Watson Korbel on the 7 Synergies for Business Success.  We found a lot of similarities between what Pam does and recommends and what we at Science of Business do (Theory of Constraints) and recommend.  Here is the video interview and below is Pam's article on the 7 Synergies.  Please leave your comments to this video!



7 Synergies for Business Success



Who can deny that they want more money, less work, more fun.™ In fact, no one has ever told me that this SmartGrowth brand promise was senseless. More often, they want to know the formula to achieve this level of freedom. The seven synergies for business success will lead you to this fountain.

Many of you will work hard to set goals and devise business plans to achieve growth... in sales, in profits, in business valuations. At the same time you probably feel a little “befuddled” about what to expect given the current state of the economy and business environment.

The following list of “tried and true” business synergies come from over 20 years of experience working with hundreds of small and mid-sized companies throughout the United States. The principles work during an economic upturn or downturn. Whether it was the Mid-western recession of the mid-80’s, the early 90’s California recession, the late 90’s boom or today, time has proven these growth principles. Keep them in mind as you plan today and in the future. Each synergy includes a checklist of tangible actions you can take in your business to implement each principle.

1. Grow from the inside out.

To profitably grow your sales, build off the foundation already proven successful in your company. Focus on your customer base and your product and service portfolio. Prioritize opportunities according to this list:

• The easiest way to grow your sales and profit is to sell more of your existing product to your existing clients.

• The second easiest way is to sell new products to existing clients.

• The third priority should be to find new clients for your existing products.

• Do not create new products for customers you don’t have yet.

Another way of looking at this is that it is easier and less expensive to find new products for existing customers than it is to find new customers.
___ an ideal client profile exists

___ sales and marketing budget that targets existing and new customers

___ system for competitive research

___ defined process to generate leads

___ defined process to maintain client relationships

___ defined process to submit bids and write proposals

___ a process exists to identify opportunities for new products and services

___ existing customers are served first each day

2. Develop a “brand promise” and live it daily.

Once you have been in business for two or three years, your customer base is large enough that, through a focus group or interviews, you can uncover why customers “really” buy from you. That is brand promise. When you know and understand that promise, integrate it into every aspect of your business. Just think of McDonald’s brand promise to provide you with consistency. Do they live that promise daily? Would they be where they are today if they had not?

___ clients provide referrals

___ company maintains a client/prospect data base

___ system for regular customer feedback and research

___ system for gathering input about products and services

___ incentives provided for repeat business with company

___ the company has a written definition of quality

___ vendors must meet standards for quality

___ company defines a competitive market position that is unique

___ the company can measure “real” image and reputation

3. Put people first.

On one of my new motivational calendars this saying appears: “Keep your employees happy and they will keep your customers happy.” Another page says, “Companies don’t succeed, people do.” Whether times are good or not, the most successful companies have found that people are the critical difference to long-term success in a competitive environment.
___ employees are encouraged to cross boundaries

___ turnover is below the industry average

___ an employee appreciation plan is in place

___ an employee recognition system is in place

___ managers may deviate from defined policies to be flexible with employees when it does not hurt the business

___ employees receive on-the-job and/or classroom training every year

___ employees understand what decisions may be made without management approval

___ the company has an employee manual

___ every employee has a job description

4. Values validate valuation.

Having worked at Enron in its early days of the 80’s and now lived to see where it ended up, I have no better testimony as to the importance of defining company values and living them. In the end, they do validate your company’s valuation.
___ prospective employees are screened for their fit with company values

___ a written, company values statement is provided in the employee handbook and visibly posted throughout the company

___ the executives discuss the company’s values statement during employee orientation and at least twice a year at company meetings

5. Lead to create and maintain wealth.

Michael Gerber of the E-Myth has a great saying, “Owners need to work ON their business not IN it.” How much time do you spend every week working IN versus ON your business? Your job description and duties should be oriented so that the business operates without you. Those businesses have higher valuations.
___ an exit plan for the business exists

___ succession plans exist for each shareholder working in the business and every key manager and key employee

___ the valuation of the business is re-evaluated annually

___ the industry system for establishing business value is well understood (value drivers, methods of valuation commonly used, trends)

___ owners spend four or more weeks a year away from the business

___ strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats reviewed twice a year

6. Hire both leaders AND managers.

Leaders work on strategy, vision, mission, values and goals. They rely on managers to create systems, implement goals, and deliver the brand promise. Every business needs both leaders and managers. The person who can be both a leader and manager is truly gifted and rare.
___ regular meetings are held at the shareholder, executive and employee levels

___ the company has 5-year, 1-year, quarterly and monthly goals

___ the company posts its mission, vision, values and goals

___ the company has a business plan (sales forecast, expense budget, organizational chart and plan)

___ outside advisors meet regularly with the shareholders and management

___ employees document policies and procedures


7. Monitor, Monitor, Monitor…whatever you measure will improve.

I have never seen this fail. When clients are short on cash and they start measuring it, cash improves. When businesses do not have enough sales to cover overhead and they monitor sales daily, sales increase. When employees overspend and management starts monitoring, expenses decline.

___ each business function develops monthly and quarterly goals

___ each business function has one to four key numbers that it monitors via a written report

___ each employee understands his/her one key measurement

___ each employee has a performance contract or scorecard

___ each employee has a performance review twice a year

___ employee compensation is driven by performance and merit

___ company measures itself against a budget

___ company compares results to industry standards and sets goal to exceed the industry

___ financial statements are produced by the 10th of each month

___ monthly sales reports are prepared by the 5th of each month

___ sales are measured daily


The Intangible Synergy – The quality of the CEO is directly proportional to the quality of the company.

Great CEOs incorporate the skills of discipline in their personal lives and those skills carry over to company results.

___ Company executives, managers and employees follow a time management discipline.

___ The company follows a regular meeting schedule.

___ Wellness is promoted among all stakeholders.

___ Personal balance is encouraged among employees.

___ All stakeholders are satisfied with the communication practices.

___ Stakeholders share a positive affirmation that the company will succeed.

With these simple tenets, there is no reason for more money, less work and more fun™ to be a mystery. If you have not started setting goals and developing a plan for this year, start now. If you have, did you incorporate these guidelines?

The big payoff if you follow these guidelines is simple freedom to choose your activities. By growing successful businesses, women business leaders will achieve the freedom to spend more time on corporate boards, community service and public policy.

You can contact Pam at http://www.smartgrowth.com/.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Overcoming Resistance to Change (BEHIND THE SCENES)

FUNNY "Behind the Scenes" of the Overcoming Resistance to Change video. This was recorded at the TOCICO conference BEFORE the video was released. Watch Eli (Eliyahu M Goldratt) draw the mermaid!

Theory of Constraints Resistance to Change and Isn't It Obvious book are worth investigating.


Theory of Constraints Overcoming Resistance To Change

Here's a couple of my TOCTips from Twitter.  Both are on the subject of overcoming resistance to change from the Theory of Constraints perspective.

[TOC Tip241] Want people 2 accept change? Present THEIR + – 2 change & their + - 2 not changing. Theory of Constraints #tocot

[TOC Tip240] People do NOT resist change, they judge it. Theory of Constraints #tocot

Now here is a video on how to do it.  This video was written by Eliyahu M Goldratt, author of The Goal to promote his NEW edition of his still relatively new book, Isn't It Obvious.


Leave your comments (or questions) and let me know what you think about the video and/or about the content.  Do you agree with this video?

Here's to Maximizing YOUR Profits,
Dr Lisa

P.S.  If you'd like to follow my daily TOCTips on Twitter, go here:  http://www.Twitter.com/TOCExpert

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Subject: Theory of Constraints 2 Laws of Leadership (Part 2)

In Part 1 I covered the Theory of Constraints first Law of Leadership -- “Don’t be a sissy!” And I have to admit I was holding my breath as I clicked the send button. I was direct (as I tend to be) and I wasn’t sure what your response would be.
 
It stirred up a lot of response. My heart rate increased as the first responses starting showing up within 10 minutes! Here are just a few of the first responses I received:
 

“Liked this one a lot!”

“I really love this – I talk to “just do it” all the time in my work (it’s in a frame on my desk). Adding “don’t be a sissy” is fantastic.”

“Amen”

“Great mail Lisa!”

“Agreed and amen!!“
So it seems that I have your permission to be direct (except for the few people who unsubscribed).  Now, I want to cover the second Theory of Constraints Law of Leadership – “Just do it!”

So now that you know how not to be a sissy and you’ve decided what you are going to go do. Just do it!

“Just do it” does NOT mean steam rolling your people (but at the same time don’t let THEM be sissies!), it means to focus and get it done NOW.

Use the Theory of Constraints buy-in and “yes, but …” processes to get agreement on what you want to do and why you want to do it. These processes also serve to clarify what exactly you’re going to go do and usually the solution improves in the process.

Then, if you have someone who just doesn’t want to do it -- do it anyway. Ask them if they are willing to try (really try) it. If so, then get on with it. If not, it maybe it’s time to replace that person with someone who is.

Don’t make excuses as to why you can’t start now. If there are other things going on, and those things are NOT your biggest most important project (yes singular) – stop doing them. You can start them again if they become your biggest priority.

There are really only 2 Theory of Constraints “Just Do It” measures:

1) Reliability – did you do what you said, when you said you’d do it. Whatever the something was you decided to do that we talked about in Part 1 – did you do it on-time? If you are unreliable you didn’t. If you are reliable you did it and finished when you said you would. Due date performance is a type of reliability measure.

2) Effectiveness – you didn’t waste time being distracted on other things and/or doing things you shouldn’t have been done. Ineffectiveness is the biggest cause of unreliability and “not doing”. If you’re doing things you shouldn’t, typically you are making it very difficult to be reliable and get done what you should. Inventory is a type of ineffectiveness measure – if you have produced something ahead of when it was needed in order to be efficient or to save money.

Being ineffective is really a focusing issue – both not working on the right things and working on too many things at one time.

So get really clear on what you’re going to do and what you’re NOT going to do and then get it done.

And to me, that takes care of leadership. There are only 2 things you need to do:

1) Don’t be a sissy!

2) Just do it!

One of the best leaders I’ve interacted with recently was one of my Velocity Scheduling System clients – Tanya DiSalvo, President, Criterion Tool. Her team was struggling with buying into VSS but she held firm (definitely not a sissy) and then focused on doing it. And doing it right, not some watered down version of what the group was first willing to do.

Here’s the payoff she and her team got:



 
And I received this email update from Tanya on June 6, 2010:

“Welp it’s Criterion’s one year anniversary with the VSB (Velocity Scheduling System) and WE STILL love it!
A few major projects went thru our building: new product launch in Oct- Dec, another new product launch currently under way, reduction of staff thru attrition and increase in work, and in most cases we came thru with flying colors.

Attached is our score card. :)”
Wishing you unsissified success,

Dr Lisa

P.S. Make sure that you click on the links above. They link to additional information and some really good stuff.

P.P.S. If you run a custom job shop and are frustrated with scheduling -- check out the Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program  http://www.velocityschedulingsystem.com/

P.P.P.S Download the "9 Challenges to Scheduling Your Job Shop and Why Your Schedule is Dead on Arrival" special report here: http://www.velocityschedulingsystem.com/ebook/

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Theory of Constraints 2 Laws of Leadership

July 4th makes me think of being patriotic and that makes me think of the military and the military makes me think of our great leaders. So I did a little internet surfing on leadership.

In a Google search there were 154,000,000 results for the word leadership. On the National Speakers Association's website there are 650 speakers who are experts on Leadership.

I don't know about you, but as an engineer and NOT a very touchy feely kind of person, I have trouble relating to all the discussion on leadership.

I don't have anything against leadership or the people who speak on it or write about it (there are tons of those people and some of them are my friends), I just don't see what the big deal is.

Theory of Constraints is about focus, so assuming you are focused.  There are only 2 things - guiding principles if you will -- that a leader or manager needs to keep in mind.  I call them the Theory of Constraints 2 Laws of Leadership:

1) Don't be a sissy!

2) Just do it!

Any leader, who is bold about what they want and goes after it without apology and with perseverance, has my attention. And if this direction is delivered in a respectful way, they have my respect. I will follow where they lead. (Am I alone here?)

Now that sounds easy, probably too easy. So let's apply it. Don't be a sissy means - don't let old patterns, past ways of doing things, and failures stop you from finally getting 99+% on time all the time, reducing lead-time, and from dramatically reducing chaos or whatever your goals are.

Pick a technique, a philosophy, or anything that you think might get you closer to your goals. And realize that if you want improvement, you have to DO SOMETHING different. It is also true that not all change is improvement, so select carefully, but DO make a selection.

I once told a client who wanted to do an incentive program (which generally I'm against) that I didn't care if they wanted to bring clowns in on Fridays - but to DO SOMETHING.

Now, I'm partial to my programs and Theory of Constraints for the "something to do" - but even if you don't go with the changes I recommend, you will get some improvement simply by doing something and sticking with it.

For example GE chose Six Sigma as the horse they would ride. I can tell you why that may not be the best overriding philosophy, and how they could get better results by using Theory of Constraints to direct their Six Sigma efforts (see 2 articles below), but the reality is that they did improve by making the selection and sticking to it.

Don't be a sissy also means don't make excuses and don't blame anyone but yourself for the results you get or don't get.

It is our job as managers to put systems and processes in place that get the results we want. Our systems and processes comprise the policies, procedures and measures that direct our peoples' actions. If you're not getting the results you want, just look in the mirror.

Don't listen to the voice in your head or to your employee's who say:
  • "that will never work"
  • "we already tried that, and it doesn't work here"
  • "you don't understand ..."
And one other thing that "don't be a sissy" means is that if you make a mistake, chose wrong, or fail - then get over it and find what IS going to work.

This is NOT in conflict with my prior statement of "sticking with it". I find that people either 1) don't try something long enough to see if it's going to work - they get distracted by the next new shiny thing; or 2) they stick with it forever despite the poor results.

I'm suggesting a rational balance between the two. And a good way to do that is to decide ahead of time what success and failure look like, then do everything to can to make whatever you decided to do a success.

If you want better results you are going to have to do things differently. Simply decide WHAT you're going to do and just do it.

Next time, I'll dive into the Theory of Constraints second Law of Leadership -- "Just do it!"

Wishing you unsissified success and a happy July 4th,   (Please post your thoughts and comments to this post.)
 
Dr Lisa

P.S. Here are links to 2 articles on the subject of Theory of Constraints and Six Sigma: http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/Portals/0/SixSigma2.pdf and http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/Portals/0/2006MayTLSArticle.pdf (this one includes Lean)

P.P.S Check out http://www.velocityscheduingsystem.com/ if you have a custom job shop and need to reduce time through your shop, get on-time and reduce chaos.  This is a coaching program to help implement what you read in the Theory of Constraints book The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt.  WARNING:  This is NOT training, this is a go and do program. 

P.P.P.S Download the "9 Challenges to Scheduling Your Job Shop and Why Your Schedule is Dead on Arrival" special report here:  http://www.velocityschedulingsystem.com/ebook/

(c)Copyright 2010, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

The biggest constraint we Theory of Constraints consultants find is ... (part 3)

This is Part 3 of a multi-part series that will be posted on the Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program blog. We covered the biggest constraints we find as Theory of Constraints consultants.

Read Part 3 here: http://velocityschedulingsystem.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-biggest-constraint-we-theory-of-constraints-consultants-find-is-%e2%80%a6-part-3/
 
The Velocity Scheduling System Coaching Program is a guided implementation of the Theory of Constraints Drum Buffer Rope. 

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 66 You Want Me To Do WHAT? (conclusion)

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}


So how do we get the key people in a highly custom job shop to do the totally counter intuitive steps of the Velocity Scheduling System (based on Theory of Constraints Simplified Drum Buffer Rope)? Well, instead of pushing the steps of a system they don’t understand, don’t agree with, and have no intuition around - we build on a previous success.


What success? Ask any custom job shop if they have ever pulled out all the stops for a customer and turned a job really quickly. Most (probably all) will say yes. Ask them to tell you the story. You will find that they were able to do a job in a fraction of their typical quoted lead-time. For example, one client did a job in 3 days that they would normally quote a 6 week lead-time for.

When they are telling the story ask about what they had to do to get that job done. And what did they had to stop doing or what jobs did they have to stop working on to make it happen. Listen very closely, take notes and ask questions to draw out the story.

Typically they will explain how they had to stop working on a several jobs that they had already started. Then they will talk about how they "crashed" the job. "Crashing a job" is our terminology for bringing multiple resources to bear on a job. They might have used 2 lathes to run operation 1. And as soon as one piece was done it immediately went to operation 2 on a mill instead of waiting for all it sister parts to complete operation 1. In this way, the job just zipped through the shop.

They were able to complete this job so quickly because they 1) reduced work in process by stopping work on other jobs; 2) By focusing on finishing this one job and 3) by "crashing the job" and bringing multiple resources to work on it.

These 3 actions are some of the key components of the Velocity Scheduling System (VSS). The problem you would discover is that they think that they cannot continue to take these actions on an on-going basis. And if they did, they would be inefficient and the company would lose money.

So what we now explain, is that the VSS is a system that will help them find the balance between what they did on that rush job and efficiency. Then we simply ask - would you be willing to try it and to help customize VSS for their plant. We will explain everything, but knowledge does not change behavior, what we need from you is a commitment to try what we ask.

Who would say no to that? Particularly in the group environment we have for our VSS Coaching Program.

If we can get the biggest detractor for each company to agree to try it, to really do the program, they are unlikely to go back on their word. (Law of Consistency) Then, the crystal clear step by step instructions of VSS, in combination with their story and experiences will help the new process (VSS) to stick.

This process of building on a success can be used in any number of circumstances. We’ve also used it to help companies with their sales and marketing, project completion, and distribution solutions. How can you use it? Drop us a line and let us know your thoughts.

What's your experience with buy-in? Please add your comments to this post  (really, I want to know).

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!

Dr Lisa

(c)Copyright 2010, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 62 Exit Planning Questions

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

Brad: Next, we have a choice. Most business owners have a desire to transfer the business to one or more "insiders", but the business may be worth more and the business owner would make more money sooner if the business was sold to a third party. So, it's helpful to choose one or the other for exit planning. Choosing one initially doesn't mean that you can't change your mind later:

4. Do you know how to sell your business to a third party and potentially pay the least possible taxes?

5. Do you have any plans on how you will transfer your business to family members, co-owners or employees while paying the least possible taxes and enjoying maximum financial security?

Dr. Lisa: And why do you say that transferring to insiders yields less money or takes longer for the business owner when compared to a third party sale?

Brad: Most businesses are not saleable. They are too small, not profitable enough, or have some other issue(s). No business broker or investment banker will waste their time representing a business that buyers won't buy. If a business is valuable enough to be sold to a third party, the process takes time to execute and there are plenty of pitfalls, but business owners that can sell to a third parties usually do. The threshold is somewhere between $5 and $10 million in business value, depending on market conditions and the quality of the company. These business owners cash out, and with proper planning, can still take care of the insiders they want to.

But it is valid to transfer to insiders. The problem is that most family members, co-owners, and employees don't have any money! What is required in this case is an elegant exit plan, because it will be the current and future cash flow of the business that is needed to fund the business owner's exit from the business, in conjunction with the ownership transfer. I find it interesting that rather that selling for maximum value as in a third party sale, transferring for the lowest defensible value is the best way for the business owner to maximize after-tax cash in a transferring to insiders.

Dr. Lisa: Transferring to insiders sounds complicated.

Brad: It doesn't need to be. In either case, a sale to a third party or a transfer to insiders, the business owner needs professional help. But we aren't done with the questions that need answering. The next two are related:
6. Do you have a continuity plan for you business if the unexpected happens to you?

7. Does your family have financial contingency plans if the unexpected happens to you?

Dr. Lisa: In TOC, we say the first rule of management is to "be paranoid". So this has to do with business continuity and personal wealth and estate planning. Are most business owners prepared?

Brad: Some are but most aren't. And even if a business owner did a buy-sell agreement, or estate planning, chances are that was years ago and the documents are out-of-date. Exit Planning requires a team of advisors, coordinated by an exit planning professional. Creating an exit planning roadmap, implementing it over time, and keeping it up-to-date is crucial for the business owner that wants to meet his or her retirement objectives.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to have an Exit Plan? Go to http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/exitplan.aspx and take the first step.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Here's to maximizing YOUR profits (and selling price of YOUR business)!

Dr Lisa
(c)Copyright 2010, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 61 Exit Planning Questions

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

Dr. Lisa: Let me start. We established in our last article that Exit Planning is consistent with Theory of Constraints, Lean and Six Sigma because business owners need processes that will increase profitability and business value. So now, let's help business owners check whether they are ready to exit, or what additional steps they would need to take to be ready.

Brad: First, a business owner needs to understand his or her objectives. Here's the question we need answered:

1. Do you know your exact retirement goals and what it should take in cash to reach them?

Dr. Lisa: Oh, I like it. That's the first step in Theory of Constraints (TOC) as well, understanding the objective. And then design a process to achieve the objective more and more. In a for-profit business, it's usually "make more money now and in the future". I know my answer for question number one.

Brad: Good. Now we need to know where we are in relation to the goal. So next we need to know:

2. Do you know how much your business is worth today, in cash?

Dr. Lisa: That's a much tougher question for me - business worth.  How do you find out?


Brad: It depends. If the business owner is close to exiting, a valuation by a Certified Valuation Analyst is recommended. But if you are just starting the exit planning process, a range of value can be calculated by a qualified CPA, and should be updated annually. Industry "rules of thumb" aren't good enough, and may be misleading. Pay a few bucks and get it done. Next, we need to know:


3.  Do you know the best ways to maximize the income stream generated by your ownership interest?

Dr. Lisa: I know the answer, it's TOC!!! There is no better way to leverage existing resources to maximize profitability now and in the future. Use the Velocity Scheduling System to do more with existing resources, and create an unrefusable offer-a Mafia Offer-to sell the capacity that's revealed.

Brad: Was that a commercial? Not that there's anything wrong with that...

Dr. Lisa: Yes, of course! Theory of Constraints is so powerful and I feel inclined to remind people of that fact. We helped 30 highly custom job shops improve last year -- substancially! A 100% success rate! What else could you have had these shops do with that amount of success?

And, we've had over 70 companies go through our Mafia Offer Boot Camp -- all creating great offers that they can use to sell more and increase the value of their business.

But I digressed. Let's get back to exit planning.

Brad: The answer to question three is where most business owners get stuck both in operating their business and with exit planning. If there is a gap between what you need (question #1) and where you are (questions #2), then you need to know how to close the gap (question #3).

.... to be continued (and completed) next week in POOGI #62

----------------------------------------------------------------

Want to have an Exit Plan? Go to http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/exitplan.aspx and take the first step.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits (and selling price of YOUR business)!

Dr Lisa

(c)Copyright 2010, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 60: Exit Planning cont.

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

Dr. Lisa: What’s the impact of the economy on exit planning?


Brad: Unless the business managed to maintain its sales and profit levels and growth rates, the business is probably less valuable. So, even business owners with exit plans have probably extended the date of their exit and/or reduced the amount they are willing to accept for the business.

Dr. Lisa: How about demographics of business owners?

Brad: With so many businesses owned by baby boomers, there are a lot of business owners our there that would like to exit in the next few years. I heard a statistic the other day that half of all business owners are emotionally—not financially—ready to sell, but are waiting for a white knight to appear, meaning they aren’t doing anything to properly prepare the business for sale.

Dr. Lisa: What are the choices a business owner has for selling or transferring his business?

Brad: The business owner would usually make the most money by selling to a third party. But many business owners have different objectives, and would prefer to transfer the business to a family member(s), or another owner(s), or to an employee(s). Exit planning helps in both cases.

In a sale to a third party, exit planning can minimize taxes and yield the greatest amount of after-tax proceeds from the sale. In a transfer, exit planning can help the owner keep control as long as necessary, minimize risk, and maximize the amount of after-tax money received.

Dr. Lisa: We work with owners of small businesses all the time. I see how exit planning fits. Business owners need to put in place robust processes—using TOC, Lean, and Six Sigma—that help their company grow and become more and more profitable. And they need to put in place a management team to run the business without being dependent on the owner. Both make the business more valuable.
Brad: Correct. Without an exit plan, a business owner does not have an end in mind. However, even with an exit plan, growing more and more sales and profits is not a given. The TOC approach to marketing and sales fits perfectly. Most of these business owners do not now have an offer that is “unrefusable” to their customers and prospects (a “Mafia Offer”) and a robust sales process to deliver it. Improved marketing and sales is a requirement for every company, with or without an exit plan. But coupled with an exit plan, the business owner is more likely to meet his exit planning objectives.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to have an Exit Plan? Go to http://www.scienceofbusiness.com/exitplan.aspx and take the first step.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's to maximizing YOUR profits (and selling price of YOUR business)!

Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2009, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 59: Do you have an Exit Plan? Why not?

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}


There is nothing as fundamentally important as having an Exit Plan. The purpose of exit planning is for owners to achieve their financial and lifestyle objectives after they leave their business. It covers when you plan to exit, how much you’ll want or need from a sale/transfer of ownership, and to whom you want to transfer (a third party, family, or employees/co-owners).  Some people refer to it as succession planning, transition planning or just selling my business.


Dr. Lisa: What’s Exit Planning have to do with TOC, Lean, Six Sigma and continuous improvement?

Brad: It is consistent with TOC’s three questions. What to change, what to change to, and how to cause the change. When a business owner decides how much he or she needs from the sale of the business by when, we can calculate the growth is needed to accomplish the objective. A business that has put in place excellent processes—the kind TOC, Lean, and Six Sigma provide—coupled with a management team that can operate without being dependent on the owner, is much more valuable.

Dr. Lisa: How is exit planning done?

Brad: First, the business owner works with an exit planning advisor to develop the framework for his exit plan. This is usually developed by answering a series of questions aimed at determining when he wants to exit, how much is needed from the sale/transfer of the business in addition to other personal resources, and to whom the business owner wants to sell/transfer the business.

Next, the exit planning advisor coordinates the business owner’s other advisors—like the CPA, Estate Planning attorney, financial/insurance advisor, and business consultant—to flesh out the plan. From then on, apart from course corrections, the plan is being implemented over time until the ultimate exit.

Dr. Lisa: Are most businesses ready to sell?

Brad: No, most are not ready to sell. And a business that is not ready to sell will either be sold for less than the business owner needs, or it will be liquidated.

Dr. Lisa: In real estate, it is well known that before you buy a property, you have an exit strategy. Is this true for businesses, too? Do most business owners go into business with an exit plan?

Brad: No, most businesses are owned and run by entrepreneurs that have grown their business over time. Most of these owners are totally consumed by running their business, and have not thought enough about their eventual exit from the business. This is unfortunate because it can take several years to make the business valuable enough to meet their financial and lifestyle objectives after they leave the business.

... to be continued.  (more on exit planning next time)
 
Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang

(c)Copyright 2009, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes (TOC Thinking)

TOC is a large body of knowledge. It’s very holistic.  Underlying all of it, though, are a set of thinking processes.  If you understand how to think, you can derive any number of the Theory of Constraints solutions.

TOC Thinking is a process to recognize, verbalize, and challenge assumptions (through the use of visual tools).

There are assumptions everywhere. Some are correct and some are incorrect.  Want to communicate better? Be really clear about assumptions.

Have you ever given instructions on what you wanted done and then been surprised or frustrated about things turning out differently than what you expected? That's assumptions at work.

3 Definitions of Assumptions:

  • Accepted cause and effect relationships, or estimates of the existence of a fact from the known existence of other fact(s). [from businessdictionary.com]
  • The act of taking for granted, or supposing a thing without proof; supposition; unwarrantable claim. [from 1913 Webster]
  • Assumptions are beliefs or ideas that we hold to be true — often with little or no evidence required. [from HyperTextBooks]
More to follow ...

Theory of Constraints POOGI Part 58: We lost money on that job! cont.

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

Brad: Who cares? Is this really that important? In the last 20+ years since Throughput Accounting was invented to replace cost accounting, not very many business owners have even heard of it, much less felt a need to change.

Dr. Lisa: True. Most just went out of business slowly. Like the frog in the pot when the heat slowly increased, and never jumped before it was cooked.

Brad: When I switched the label printing business I own from cost accounting to throughput accounting back in 1997, it was uncomfortable. The process took time and perseverance. And there wasn’t much help available for me back then. But I found the sweet spot where conventional cost accounting leads business owners to believe they’d be losing money on jobs, and where throughput accounting clearly indicated we were making a load of money.

Dr. Lisa: It is really unfair to competitors when you understand throughput accounting, and price accordingly. We call that “competing with blind kittens” because cost accounting is such an inferior technology.

Brad: Cost accounting was invented before the Model T. Why do business owners that are so up-to-date with other types of technology, and appreciate keeping up with the rate of improvement in technology, not think to look for improved technology in business methods?

Dr. Lisa: I don’t know the answer to that, but my guess is that they are more comfortable with new technology in their area of expertise and less comfortable with new technology where they are not an expert – financial management. And, even if they have some interest in this new Throughput Accounting technology it’s hard to give up the old until you fully understand the new. Hmmm…that sounds familiar.

Brad: Whoa, you’re right! It did take me a lot of time to make the change. I guess that does explain why it’s easier to stay with the old technology.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!

Dr Lisa Lang

(c)Copyright 2009, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Want to catch up with technology? Have Dr. Lisa present “Maximizing Profitability and Achieving a Viable Vision” to your company, and/or have us help you with a Pricing Project to apply Throughput Accounting to your business. Your increased profits are guaranteed, and well as competitor’s indigestion and insomnia.