Showing posts with label Dr Lisa Lang. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr Lisa Lang. Show all posts

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Theory of Constraints Lesson on Evaluating an Idea

This text is from a county emergency manager in Minot, North Dakota


WEATHER BULLETIN

Up here in the Northern part of North Dakota we just recovered from a Historic event --- may I even say a "Weather Event" of "Biblical Proportions" --- with a historic blizzard of up to 25’ of snow and winds to 50 MPH that broke trees in half, knocked down utility poles, stranded hundreds of motorists in lethal snow banks, closed ALL roads, isolated scores of communities and cut power to 10 ' s of thousands.



FYI:

Obama did not come.

FEMA did nothing.

No one howled for the government.

No one blamed the government.

No one even uttered an expletive on TV.

Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton did not visit.

Our Mayors did not blame Obama or anyone else.

Our Governor did not blame Obama or anyone else either.

CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, or NBC did not visit - or even report on this category 5 snow storm.


Nobody demanded $2,000 debit cards.

No one asked for a FEMA Trailer House.

No one looted.

Nobody - I mean Nobody demanded the government do something.

Nobody expected the government to do anything either.

No Larry King, No Bill O ' Reilly, No Oprah, No Chris Mathews and No Geraldo Rivera.

No Shaun Penn, No Barbara Streisand, No Brad Pitts, No Hollywood types to be found.


Nope, we just melted the snow for water.

Sent out caravans of SUV 's to pluck people out of snow engulfed cars.

The truck drivers pulled people out of snow banks and didn’t ' t ask for a penny.

Local restaurants made food, and the police and fire departments delivered it to the snow bound families..

Families took in the stranded people - total strangers.


We fired up wood stoves, broke out coal oil lanterns or Coleman lanterns.

We put on an extra layers of clothes because up here it is "Work or Die".

We did not wait for some affirmative action government to get us out of a mess created by being immobilized by a welfare program that trades votes for ' sitting at home ' checks.

Even though a Category 5 blizzard of this scale is not usual, we know it can happen and how to deal with it ourselves.


I hope this gets passed on.

Maybe ......

SOME people will get the message ......

The world does Not owe you a living.

12/29/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn’t this interesting?  I don't know if it's really true, that it was sent by an emergency manager in North Dakota, but I love the message.


Now for the Theory of Constraints lesson …


If you were in charge of emergency management for your county how would you prepare?


In Theory of Constraints, one of the things we use to prepare is the phenomenal human ability to find anything and everything wrong with an idea. We call it the “yes, but”.


Whenever we are presented with an idea or solution that did not originate in our own heads, we think and sometimes say “yes, but …”.


We are saying yes to part of the solution, BUT we have a concern about another part of the solution or about a negative that we think could result.


And in some cases the “yes, but” could be the result of our misunderstanding of the solution.


But in any case, and in many company cultures saying it out loud is frowned upon, at least depending on whose idea it was. So many “yes, buts …” never get verbalized.


What a shame and what a missed opportunity!


We use the “yes, buts” technique in the Velocity Scheduling System and our Mafia Offer Boot Camp.


“Yes, buts” can clear up miss understandings, improve already good solutions and help you to find a solution for what seems like an impossible situation.


So if you were in charge of emergency management, would you encourage “yes, buts”? Would you follow every potential negative to see where it leads and determine if it’s worth being prepared for?


I think you would. So why not do that as you're making decisions in your company? Why not make voicing “yes, buts” a positive thing?


Let me know what you think, by leaving a comment on this post.   


And you may also want to check out this related article:
http://drlisamaxprofit.blogspot.com/2009/12/theory-of-constraints-poogi-part-53-yes.html


Dr Lisa Lang
President, Science of Business
 
2011 Copyright, Science of Business.  All rights reserved.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Theory of Constraints Handbook Chapter 22 Mafia Offers

Chapter 22 of the Theory of Constraints Handbook is my chapter.  It's titled Mafia Offers:  Dealing with a Market Constraint.

Here's the Amazon description:
"Spend just two hours reading this chapter and if you don't get at least one good idea for your business, contact me and I will give you a refund!" Dr Lisa Lang That's a Mafia Offer and it's real. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce you to the Mafia Offer-the Theory of Constraints (TOC) marketing solution. The chapter progresses from the discovery of what a Mafia Offer is, to the guidelines for creating an offer, to how to present an offer, and ends with how the reader can create their own Mafia Offer. A Mafia Offer delivered correctly, can give you better control over your sales. What's better control? How about closing as much as 80 percent of your opportunities?

Because this chapter is on marketing, I thought that a good marketer should get their book to #1, otherwise you're not really practicing what you preach.  So after a little marketing campaign, Chapter 22 is still number 1.  During the campaign we reached #1 in two categories, but as of today July 29, 2010, here is the current ranking:

#1 in Kindle Store > Kindle Books > Business & Investing > Management & Leadership > Quality Control


Click here to get the BEST price for the Theory of Constraints Handbook!  (this is for the whole book)
 
Click here to get the BEST price for Chapter 22 on Mafia Offers!  (this is for the DIGITAL version of Chapter 22, there is not a printed version of just Chapter 22). 

--------------------------------------------------
Here are the 4 reviews for Chapter 22 that have been posted on Amazon so far:

5.0 out of 5 stars Business can now rise way above the Blah Blah Blah, July 17, 2010
By Casinero - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: Mafia Offers: Dealing with a Market Constraint (Chapter 22 of Theory of Constraints Handbook) (Kindle Edition)

At last! Someone has written a superbly useful methodology for anyone in any situation to rise above the crowd. A must read for anyone who wants to sell "ANYTHING" including themselves, and hey! who doesn't want to sell themselves.

Fabulous job Dr Lisa.
 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:


5.0 out of 5 stars Appreciating the Master: Dr Lisa, June 29, 2010
By Jeff 'SKI' Kinsey (Hilton Head Island SC) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: Mafia Offers: Dealing with a Market Constraint (Chapter 22 of Theory of Constraints Handbook) (Kindle Edition)

Dr Lisa once again brings real value to the market. There are about a thousand Constraints Management folks that know how the tools work at some level that brings value to their clients. Then, there are a small handful of true experts that have applied the tools so often as to become the de facto standard bearer. When it comes to unrefusable offers (UROs) also known as Mafia Offers, Dr Lisa is a group of one. Period. I am pleased to add this chapter to my iPod touch.


5.0 out of 5 stars Great chapter on Mafia Offers, July 3, 2010
By Mr. C. J. Ching (a kiwi in Scotland) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: Mafia Offers: Dealing with a Market Constraint (Chapter 22 of Theory of Constraints Handbook) (Kindle Edition)

This is a nice little read covering the essentials of what a mafia offer is, how it differs from other marketing approaches, and how to construct one.
Buy this chapter: it's a very small bet which could have a huge financial payoff for your business.
 
 
5.0 out of 5 Summary of Unrefusable Offers, July 16, 2010
By Lane Kagey - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: Mafia Offers: Dealing with a Market Constraint (Chapter 22 of Theory of Constraints Handbook) (Kindle Edition)

This is a good summary of unrefusable offers. It defines them and then gives some simple examples of what they look like and how to build them. It is a nice introduction to the topic.
--------------------------------------------------

Click here to get the BEST price for Chapter 22 on Mafia Offers! (I can't believe I did all that work and shared by best stuff for this thing to sell for between $5.56 and about $9 depending on where you are in the world!)
 
Here's to YOUR Mafia Offer,
 
Dr Lisa
 
P.S.  A special thanks to James Cox and John Schleier for the effort in making this project a reality.  And thanks to our publisher McGraw Hill.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Theory of Constraints Tips

Follow Dr Lisa on Twitter and get daily Goldratt Theory of Constraints (TOC) Tips.

http://twitter.com/TOCExpert

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

A Process Of On-Going Improvement (POOGI) - Part 42

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

Maximizing Profits in Uncertain Times with Goldratt Theory of Constraints

Dr. Lisa Lang presented “Maximizing Profits in Uncertain Times” at the recently completed NTMA (National Tool and Machining Association) annual conference in California. (To review the presentation slides and/or view the complete presentation, check the link mentioned below at the end of this article).

Using the famous Theory of Constraints (TOC) analogy of a chain, “Dr. Lisa” described how the weakest link of a chain determined its ability to achieve its goal of holding weight. Any increase in the strength of any link—except the weakest—had no effect on the overall goal.

Similarly, the goal of a company is to make more money now and in the future. The weakest link in our company process—the constraint—determines the performance of the company: how much money it can make. So, we must focus on and leverage the constraint.

In this economy, the constraint your company is dealing with may have shifted. For many companies, the constraint has been in operations. You have been busy, trying to get out as much as possible, and were probably dealing with long quoted lead-times and poor due date performance because of the internal constraint.

Now, in these uncertain times, many companies are faced with not enough sales. In companies used to dealing with an internal constraint, the management team frequently lacks processes and intuition for dealing with lack of sales.

Dr. Lisa presented how to address lack of sales with a “Mafia Offer”, an offer so good your customers can’t refuse it, and your competitors can’t or won’t offer the same.

A Mafia Offer typically requires that you do something different (make operational improvements) to actually deliver something un-refusable to your customers and something that your competition can't or won't do because they are not willing to or don't know how to make the same improvements.

Most companies offer solutions that solve their customers various problems or symptoms. With a Mafia Offer we are addressing our customer’s core problem.

When you have a good Mafia Offer and you deliver it correctly, your close rate can increase to above 80%. If you close 80% or more of your prospects -- you have control over your sales. This control makes it easier grow and invest in your business while maintaining the ability to deliver the offer.

Mafia Offers are developed by analyzing 3 things:
1. What are (or could be) your internal capabilities compared to your competition,
2. How does your industry, you and your competitors sell what you sell, and
3. Understanding how your clients are impacted by your current capabilities (which are usually the same as your competitors) and how you sell.

To protect the confidentiality of machine shops that have already developed their own Mafia Offer, she used an example from the printing industry. Using the TOC scheduling methodology, this printer had reduced their lead-time to two days, relative to two weeks for competition. The printer worked with clients that reordered products infrequently, in order to minimize purchase price, due to the price-quantity curve used by all printers. Because they had to forecast future usage in order to determine the quantities to order, customers invariably had too much inventory of some SKUs while they stocked out of others.

With the caveat that no company that is in the tooling and machining industry should think this Mafia Offer work for them, she told the audience the printer’s Mafia Offer:

“Mister customer, don’t give me orders. Your orders are based on your best guess of what you might need. Instead tell us every day what you used. We will guarantee on the one hand that you will not need to hold more than 2 weeks of inventory so you have more marketing flexibility and less risk for obsolescence, and at the same time we will also guarantee that you will never run out. If we ever stock you out, we will pay you $500 per day per SKU.”

That’s a Mafia Offer – best of all worlds for your customer and the printer will not pay a penalty because it only takes 2 days to replenish. The competition can not offer the same thing because they can not consistently deliver in less than 2 weeks and they could not risk paying the penalty.

The remainder of the presentation was devoted to describing the operational and mind-set changes required to have such a powerful Mafia Offer. Dr. Lisa described how Drum-Buffer-Rope scheduling works, and how “Buffer Statistics” guides ongoing improvement by pointing process weaknesses that Lean and Six Sigma tools can quickly fix.

She also described how the Mafia Offer challenged prevailing assumptions about “set-up cost”. The offer would require many more set-ups, but the printer had significant excess capacity. So, in reality, there was no additional set-up cost. Yes, there was additional set-up time, but all the people were already paid for in that period. And by knowing the importance of set-ups to delivering their Mafia Offer, the printer used Lean tools to dramatically reduce set-up time.

To view Dr. Lisa’s presentation, go to the Velocity Scheduling System page and get on the waiting list -- you'll have instant access. .



...to be continued.



Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!



Brad Stillahn



(c)Copyright 2009, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Stompernet Mafia Offer Presentation by Dr Lisa

If you want the PowerPoint slides from my Stompernet Live 8 (SNL8) Mafia Offer presentation, just click here: Dr Lisa Mafia Offer Stompernet Presentation

For more on our private or group Mafia Offer Boot Camps, please visit http://www.mafiaoffers.com/

For more on our ON-LINE Mafia Offer Boot Camp, please visit http://www.mafiaofferbootcamp.com/

A couple links that you may find of interest that Brad Fallon covered in his Stompernet Live 8 presentation:

Video overview on Critical Chain Project Management -->Critical Chain Overview

Report on how to do the T/CU calculation Brad Fallon did at the event -->http://www.informationoverloaddestroyer.com/

Books Mentioned:
The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt
It's Not Luck by Eliyahu M. Goldratt
The Choice by Eliyahu M. Goldratt
Critical Chain by Eliyahu M. Goldratt

Dr Lisa's Vistage speech, Achieving a Viable Vision (find out about T, I and OE)

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Theory of Constraints Mafia Offer + Sales Process Engineering = Explosive Growth Equation

The 2 Leading Theory of Constraints Sales & Marketing Experts
Justin Roff-Marsh and Dr Lisa Lang

discuss what happens when ...
A Mafia Offer Meets 10 Times the Volume of Sales Appointments

Here’s a limited opportunity to participate in a test Webinar featuring a conversation between Dr Lisa and Justin Roff-Marsh.

Justin gets asked (almost) daily if our approach to sales (Sales Process Engineering) complements Dr Lisa’s approach to marketing (Mafia offers). Dr Lisa finds herself regularly answering the same question.

Of course, the answer’s yes: philosophically we’re both coming from the same (TOC) place, so how could our approaches possibly be in conflict?

But the practical implementation – and integration – of these two approaches is the really interesting subject to explore. And that’s the purpose of this Webinar.

This is a test event – our first one. This means that we are only promoting this event to the TOC community.

If you like to be first to discover new ideas and you don’t mind if this event isn’t as polished as we hope it eventually will become, please reserve you seat now.


We are going to accept 20 registrations for 14 spots. So sign up now, and arrive early to make sure you get in.

The format of this event is simple. Dr Lisa and Justin will each present an overview of our approaches – and, after each overview, the presenter will be interviewed by the other.

While this is occurring, we’ll be assimilating questions from delegates and, to conclude the Webinar, each of us will pose delegates’ questions to the other.

It should be fun, and informative!

Sunday, January 11, 2009

A Process Of On-Going Improvement (POOGI) - Part 33

We are continuing our series based on The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt and the Theory of Constraints. {This series was co-written with Brad Stillahn.}

If we can compute the impact of any action using T, I, and OE, which are global measures (and part of Throughput Accounting), then we can compute the bottom line financial impact quite easily:
· Throughput minus Operating Expense equals Net Profit (T-OE=NP).
· Throughput divided by Operating Expense is Productivity (T/OE=Productivity).
· Net Profit divided by Inventory is Return on Investment (NP/I=ROI).

We recommend measuring frequently enough to continuously improve. To improve, the causes of the effects must be managed:
· Sales Dollar Days and Inventory Dollar Days should be measured daily.
· Sales, Throughput, Operating Expense, Productivity, and Return on Investment each should be measured daily, weekly, and cumulatively month-to-date and year-to-date. It’s also helpful to track each with a 13 week and/or 12 month trailing average graphically.

For additional reading on measurements, reread “The Goal” and “The Haystack Syndrome” by Dr. Goldratt. And feel free to contact us if you have questions about measurements in your organization.

We’ll discuss why incentive systems don’t work as well as measurements in an upcoming post.

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

A Process Of On-Going Improvement (POOGI) - Part 12

What is the effect on the monthly Profit and Loss statement from this?

Because cost accounting (and GAAP) requires that inventory absorb allocated costs, the effect is that all of the cost allocations from prior months that are attached to the inventory will be recognized in the month of the inventory reduction, causing a significant “loss” from this change in inventory.

If your management is aware of this, it may block the implementation of DBR in order to avoid the perceived negative impact. If no one blocks the implementation of DBR, the result will be recognized when the P&L is compiled. At that time, management will be “surprised”. So will be the bank and any other outside entity that has interest in your company’s financials.

Efficiency measurements typically evaluate the effectiveness of labor and equipment utilization. The goal is to strive for as high of efficiency as possible for all resources. However, DBR strives to have high utilization on only one resource: the system’s constraint. As a result, all other labor and equipment resources will have lower efficiencies. Again, if management perceives this as a negative outcome, it may block the implementation. Or, if DBR is implemented, when the efficiency reports are generated, management will be “surprised” by the lower efficiencies on most resources. So will anyone else that has interest in your company’s efficiencies.

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.
_____________________________________________
About the authors:Brad Stillahn is a business owner that has successfully implemented Eliyahu M Goldratt's Theory of Constraints (TOC) methods in his own business and is now helping other business owners do the same. His consulting company, TOC Professionals engages in long-term relationships with companies implementing TOC. His business and personal partner is Dr. Lisa Lang. Brad can be reached at Brad@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-886-9939.

“Dr. Lisa” Lang is President of the Science of Business. Her speech “Maximizing Profitability” is popular with Vistage groups and as a keynote speech. Recently Dr. Goldratt’s Global Marketing Director, she offers the “Mafia Offer Boot Camp” for companies wanting to develop and implement a Mafia Offer. She can be reached at DrLisa@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-909-3343.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

A Process Of On-Going Improvement (POOGI) - Part 10

“Cost Accounting: Public Enemy #1 of Productivity”

Way back in 1983, prior to writing his popular business novel “The Goal”, Dr. Eliyahu M Goldratt gave a speech by this controversial and confrontational title at a conference of Management Accountants. However, it was well received because the problems with cost accounting are well known to knowledgeable management accounting professionals. For them, agreeing that there are problems with cost accounting was not the issue. The question was “what is the alternative?”

That is where we left our discussion last month. We had provided an overview of Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR) scheduling. We warned that cost accounting assumptions may block you from implementing this powerful scheduling methodology and promised to discuss both the issues with cost accounting and introduce the solution: Throughput Accounting.

Management Accounting’s objective is to make the connection between managers’ local actions and the company’s profitability so managers can know if their actions are leading the company toward its goal.

The problem with cost accounting is the focus on cost.

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

___________________________________________________________
About the authors:

Brad Stillahn is a business owner that has successfully implemented TOC methods in his own business and is now helping other business owners do the same. His consulting company, TOC Professionals engages in long-term relationships with companies implementing TOC. His business and personal partner is Dr. Lisa Lang. Brad can be reached at Brad@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-886-9939.

“Dr. Lisa” Lang is President of the Science of Business. Her speech “Maximizing Profitability” is popular with Vistage groups and as a keynote speech. Recently Dr. Goldratt’s Global Marketing Director, she offers the “Mafia Offer Boot Camp” for companies wanting to develop and implement a Mafia Offer. She can be reached at DrLisa@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-909-3343.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Leverage - Theory of Constraints

Tom Foster of ManagementBlog.org interviewed me about Goldratt's Theory of Constraints. Here is the fifth installment:

--- Start interview
TF: If we do a good job of placing our constraint in our highest cost, most scarce resource, what is the next most difficult thing to do?

Dr. Lisa: Leverage it. Leverage is a great word but we are not taught how to do this or what we are taught is simply wrong.

The book The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt describes leverage as exploiting the constraint and subordinating everything else based on the point where you have placed the constraint.

Exploit means not wasting any of what you have. Subordinating is often the harder one because it requires the non-constraint silos to fall in line by supporting the exploitation of the constraint. This is difficult because each silo is usually measured and rewarded on its individual results.
---End interview

That completes Tom's interview of me.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Hard to Get - Theory of Constraints

Tom Foster of ManagementBlog.org interviewed me about Goldratt's Theory of Constraints. Here is the fourth installment:

--- Start interview
TF: If the idea is to strategically select your bottleneck (constraint), what are the characteristics you look for in a strategic constraint?

Dr. Lisa: A strategic constraint should be relatively hard to get more of, compared to a non-constraint. Hard to get more of, means that it’s expensive, hard to find, hard to train or something like that.

Non-constraints, on the other hand, are generally less expensive and easier to get. And a starting rule of thumb is to have 25% excess capacity at your non-constraints.

So we are leveraging our very expensive hard to get resource (constraint) and we have excess capacity at our easier to acquire (non-constraint) resources.
---End interview

...to be continued.
Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Don't Chase It - Theory of Constraints

Tom Foster of ManagementBlog.org interviewed me about Goldratt's Theory of Constraints. Here is the third installment:

--- Start interview
TF: You talk about bottlenecks in systems. Conventional wisdom says bottlenecks are bad and that it is management’s job to get rid of them.

Dr. Lisa: Bottlenecks are what determine how much money you can make. I don’t think of them as bad. They just are. And by definition you will always have one. The question is, where is it? But, unless you have unlimited profits, you have a bottleneck, somewhere.

If you think bottlenecks or constraints are bad (like we were taught), then you will strive to get rid of them. But, as soon as you get rid of one bottleneck, another pops up, somewhere else. Essentially, we are taught to chase them around. Find them and get rid of them. It’s like being trapped in that arcade game – Whack-A-Mole.

If, by definition, you always have a weakest link or bottleneck, instead of chasing it around, my recommendation is to strategically place it. You decide where you want this control point to be. By doing that, you can get very good leveraging it and knowing how to control and grow your business with this control point.

So bottlenecks are not bad. Management’s job is to control them so that we can meet our commitments and grow. And more importantly to LEVERAGE them so that profits can be maximized.
---End interview

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Maximize the System - Theory of Constraints

Tom Foster of ManagementBlog.org interviewed me. Here is the second installment:

--- Start interview
TF: Intuitively, we try to maximize efficiency (profitability) of the entire company by working in each functional area to maximize its efficiency. We are thinking if every area is absolutely efficient, then by default, the entire company will be profitable. You disagree.

Dr. Lisa: Take an extreme case where a company may break itself into separate P&Ls. The logic is that if we maximize each P&L then we will maximize the P&L of the company as a whole. (And of course it’s much easier to hold each manager accountable only for their own P&L.)

I have a client, a not for profit, who collects donations that they sell in 14 retail stores. Each store has its own P&L and each store manager is measured and rewarded accordingly. The average selling price of an item is $2.25.

Imagine you are one of the underperforming stores in this company. To improve your profit, you need to sell a lot of volume at $2.25.

There are, however, some donated items that fetch $100 or more and sell very quickly. All the store managers love these items. Yet, there is one item that sells for $100 in 13 of the 14 stores, yet, sells for $200 in one of the stores, because of its location. It’s a cowboy item and this store is located near cowboys.

If I hold this item up in front of the group of 14 store managers, which store manager wants it for THEIR store? Of course, they all want the item, but, who should get the item to sell? The cowboy store can sell it for double.

So, if one of the other stores (not the cowboy store) gets a walk-in donation of one of these cowboy items, what should that store manager do?

Most store managers would keep quiet and sell the item quickly for $100 to improve their own P&L. This maximizes their own silo, but steals valuable profit from the company as a whole. This story illustrates how maximizing each silo does not necessarily benefit the system as a whole.
When management teams attack a problem, most often they try to fix a small segment of the company without even seeing the larger system problem.
---End interview

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Theory of Constraints - Systems Problems

Tom Foster of ManagementBlog.org interviewed me. Here is the first installment:

--- Start interview
A couple of weeks ago, I got to spend some time with Dr. Lisa Lang about one of my favorite subjects, Theory of Constraints. Like many of my favorite subjects, Theory of Constraints is a mindset that leads you to take action (make the right move) that is counterintuitive. In other words, left to your own devices, you would intuitively do exactly the wrong thing.

Theory of Constraints helps us to do the opposite. Theory of Constraints has been around for quite a while, but was most coherently explained by Eli Goldratt in a series of books starting with The Goal. Lisa Lang (Dr. Lisa) spent three years as the Marketing Director for Goldratt Consulting. During the past two decades she has used Theory of Constraints (TOC) to help companies solve their most serious problems. This week, I will share with you some of our conversations.

TF: When a management team realizes it has a system problem, what mistakes does it make trying to attack the situation?

Dr. Lisa: Most often, the team doesn't realize it’s a system problem. Because we are taught to manage in silos, or departments, or teams, most often, we attack the problem inside the silo, and don’t impact the system much, if at all.

By silos, I mean, we tackle sales problems separate from operations problems separate from admin problems. This happens, in part, because we have been trained to work inside our own area, indeed, not to meddle in other areas.

If you look at your organizational chart, you know the silos that exist in your company. Silos, in and of themselves are not bad. It’s that we measure each silo thinking that if we maximize each silo then we will maximize the system or the company as a whole and that’s just not what happens.
---End interview

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

A Process Of On-Going Improvement (POOGI) - Part 9

Normally, Lean and Six Sigma tools provide additional benefits very quickly. For example, it is common that the constraint resource could benefit from set-up reduction. Focusing Lean tools—which cost little to implement—results in additional capacity where it is needed and that has an immediate bottom-line result.

Due-date performance improves because of the reduction in lead-time, the increased capacity, the predictability of the time to process an order has improved, and jobs are prioritized according to due date.

The “Drum” is the schedule for the constraint resource. It sets the pace for the entire operation. In Goldratt's Theory of Constraints, we assume there is one system constraint that is limiting the throughput of the entire business. The drum is the only resource that needs to be scheduled. All other operations have relative excess capacity, meaning that orders can flow through the plant until reaching the constraint resource, and after it.

The “Buffer” is what protects the constraint from going idle from lack of material to process. The buffer needs to be large enough to prevent starvation on the constraint resource. It is really a time buffer, not physical materials, but we’ll explain that at another time.

The “Rope” is the mechanism for release of new material into the operations.

There are conventional cost accounting assumptions that may block you from implementing Drum-Buffer-Rope. Next time, we’ll address those issues, and describe how TOC’s Throughput Accounting concepts will free you to take the needed actions.

...to be continued.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!
Dr Lisa Lang(
c)Copyright 2008, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

______________________________________________________________________ About About the co-authors:

Brad Stillahn is a business owner that has successfully implemented TOC methods in his own business and is now helping other business owners do the same. His consulting company, TOC Professionals engages in long-term relationships with companies implementing TOC. His business and personal partner is Dr. Lisa Lang. Brad can be reached at Brad@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-886-9939.

“Dr. Lisa” Lang is President of the Science of Business. Her speech “Maximizing Profitability” is popular with Vistage groups and as a keynote speech. Recently Dr. Goldratt’s Global Marketing Director, she offers the “Mafia Offer Boot Camp” for companies wanting to develop and implement a Mafia Offer. She can be reached at DrLisa@ScienceofBusiness.com or 303-909-3343.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

How to Sell Your Mafia Offer - Part 4

Now that we have discussed how to open the presentation by "agreeing on the problem", we will cover the next steps -- "agreeing on the direction of the solution".

Continuing with what the PowerPoint Solutions For Sale presentation ...

Usually I transition by saying something like "so if we have accurately captured the problem, we then need to determine criteria for a good solution". We then review the slide with this criteria and get the prospects feedback. We also note that this criteria should be used to evaluate any potential solution, even one from a competitor.

Once we have agreement on the criteria for a good solution we review our solution -- our mafia offer. We usually give an overview of our offer and then go into each component of it in more detail. In this way they get a preview of whats to come and then can concentrate on what is being presented.

After we have reviewed our offer, we return to the criteria for a good solution and ask if our offer has met those criteria. This is agreeing that the "solution solves the problem".

... stay tuned for Part 5.

Here's to Maximizing YOUR Profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2007, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

How to Sell Your Mafia Offer - Part 3

In Part 2 we discussed how we start the Theory of Constraints Mafia Offer Solutions for Sales presentation by agreeing on the problem. I can't stress enough how important it is to really nail this first part of the presentation.

In no more than 4 slides you should be able to describe how YOUR industry (you and your competitors) are having a negative impact on your customer's bottom-line. If you can do this instead of the typical "Background of Our Company" and "Background of Our Products" they will be eager to hear what yo have to say next instead of being half asleep.

During this part of the presentation I like to generate conversation if there is an opportunity. This is nice because often there are people in the room (we will discuss who should be in the room later) who are not fully aware of these situations or the order of magnitude of them. For example (continuing for the Part 2 example) I may ask if in fact they have the experience of having to hold higher inventories due to a supplier's policy and if despite the fact that they have too much of some inventory do they stock out or almost stock out of others. I'm hoping to hear a story about a time when they ended up having to dump a bunch of inventory and also one about what happened when the stocked out.

Once we have our customer's head shaking in agreement and they have shared a couple stories, they are actually eager to hear what you have to say next. You are the first vendor that has so eloquently described the dynamic between industry practices and you verbalized it better than even they have or could.

The next thing we cover is "Agree on the direction of the solution".

... stay tuned for Part 3.

Here's to Maximizing YOUR Profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2007, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

PS There are only a couple Mafia Offer Boot Camps remaining this year. Act fast or January 2008 will be your next opportunity!

Sunday, September 16, 2007

How to Sell Your Mafia Offer - Part 2

In Part 1 we discussed some background on "framing" and the importance of how you present an offer. So now we are going to apply that to presenting a Theory of Constraints (TOC) Mafia Offer.

During a Mafia Offer Boot Camp we create either a PowerPoint presentation (called a Solutions for Sales presentation) with your offer and/or what we call a 1 Pager. In both cases we follow the same framing.

  1. Agree on the problem.
  2. Agree on the direction of the solution.
  3. Agree that our solution solves the problem.

The above is part of the Theory of Constraints buy-in process. Notice the resemblance to what was presented in Part 1 regarding Ludwig von Mises' three requirements for an individual to change:

  1. The individual must be dissatisfied with the current state of affairs.
  2. They must see a better state.
  3. They must believe that they can reach that better state.
Let's look at each step in some detail.

1. Agreeing on the Problem.

In the PowerPoint presentation we start with "Analysis of the Supplier's Practices". In this part of the presentation we show how suppliers in our industry (us and our competitors) have a negative impact on our customer's business. These negative effects are due to our practices. Typically these practices are common across our industry and include minimum order requirements, scheduling practices, lead-times, and so on. In this way we are starting with how OUR practices are the cause for at least some of their problems.

Here's an example:
Supplier Practice: Minimum Order Quantities and Volume Discounts
Customer's Mode of Behavior: Batch orders (delay ordering) to accumulate needs and order larger quantities than immediate needs require to get the discount.
Implications on Customer's Business: High inventory with all the cost and risk that goes with it.

Here's another:
Supplier Practice: Charge based on time or by project.
Customer's Mode of Behavior: Slow decision process (check references, etc.) to be sure that promised benefits will be actualized.
Implications on Customer's Business: Promised benefits are not always realized or if they are, they were delayed.

When you do the typical sales call -- show up and throw up spouting all the features and benefits of your product or service, the customer is automatically resisting and looking for reasons not to buy. By starting with how WE negatively impact them, customers are more open to hear what we have to say next.

I typically like to generate discussion around these problems because often times there are people in the room that were not aware of the situation or the magnitude of the problem.

In the 1 Pager we start similarly but we have an opening sentence or two to explain the problem(s). We would start with something like:
Widget suppliers typically require their customers to order minimum quantities and give further incentives to place even bigger orders because that's what's best for them. Have you followed the rules? Have a small mountain of inventory? But still stock out? Is doing what's best for us, not as good for you?

... stay tuned for Part 3.

Here's to Maximizing YOUR Profits!
Dr Lisa Lang
(c)Copyright 2007, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

What Makes a Guarantee Extraordinary?

"Create a market offer so good, that your customers can’t refuse it and your competition can't or won't offer the same – that’s a “mafia offer”!”

"A Mafia Offer is saying what you are going to do and doing what you said, when you said you would do it and backing it up with a penalty."

Dr Lisa Lang


This article appeared in the March 2007 issue of Chief Executive. It describes the benefits of providing an extraordinary guarantee which is one aspect of a good mafia offer (unrefusable offer, irresistible offer). An extraordinary guarantee is necessary for a good mafia offer, but not sufficient.

In Theory of Constraints we want to guarantee (usually with a penalty) something that you competitor can't or won't match. The guarantee or penalty should be big enough so that your customers know you are serious and so that your competitors won't match it.

To download this article, click here.

********************** start article *******************************************
What Makes a Guarantee Extraordinary?

Unlike typical, mundane guarantees that protect companies more than their customers, an extraordinary guarantee is a powerful promise, backed by a Draconian payout that forces a company to keep it— or else! Such a guarantee has three vital components: the promise, the payout and the payout process.

The Promise:

An extraordinary guarantee promise is a no-holds-barred statement of the benefits a company commits to providing its customers. Notably absent is the fine print that lards typical guarantees down with restrictions customers immediately see as self-protecting “weasel words.”

Take Hampton Inn, which in 1990 was one of the first companies to implement an extraordinary guarantee. Every guest is greeted at check-in by signs stating: To make sure guests get the message, front-desk people are trained to ask, “Are you familiar with our 100 percent guarantee?” Any hesitation produces an explanation that leaves no doubt that Hampton is serious about living up to its promise.

The Payout:

If customers don’t get what they’re promised, an extraordinary guarantee includes a payout that leaves them thinking, “Wow!”

This idea is counterintuitive and scary at first. The knee-jerk reaction of nearly all CEOs is, “That would cost us a fortune!” reflecting a lack of confidence in their company’s ability to consistently provide customers with the benefits they promise. That is exactly the point.
The seemingly breathtaking risk an extraordinary guarantee embodies jolts an organization. “Are you serious? Do you know what would have to change before we could do something like that?”

But when, like Tom Jones, you respond, “Not only are we serious, but I challenge everyone in our organization to think through what changes we would need—and how to make them,” the result is the rapid improvement necessary to offer an extraordinary guarantee with confidence that invocations will be rare. Like in JIT, the painful consequences of not making necessary changes ensures that they are made.

A guarantee payout that would inflict significant pain on your company will also stun your competitors.

How would you feel if you suddenly learned that a major competitor was targeting your most coveted customers with an extraordinary guarantee? “They’re doing what? Are they crazy?” After much gnashing of your executives’ teeth, the inevitable conclusion would be: “Maybe they’re crazy—but we’ve got to respond!”

Suppose, though, that your company did a textbook job of guarantee design and implementation, forcing your shocked competitors to respond. The typical competitive response would be a guarantee that is similar—but only on the surface. To believe that a company could offer an extraordinary guarantee with no planning or preparation is ludicrous.

First, employees, uninformed, untrained and having done nothing to become guarantee-ready, will shake their heads in disbelief: “They’ve decided to do what?” They will correctly conclude that management has made one of the great bonehead moves of all time. What they don’t know, of course, is that sharp minds have tweaked the guarantee to minimize the possibility of any customer invoking it, and that those who try will find themselves in a meat grinder involving proof, investigation, multiple levels of approval, lack of response to questions—the list goes on.
Nearly all customers, however, will be quick to sniff out the guarantee’s holes, embarrassing any salespeople naïve enough to pitch it. The result will be exactly the opposite of the differentiation and loyalty a true extraordinary guarantee creates. As the reality of its folly sinks in, your hapless competitor will hope its guarantee fades into obscurity before it does too much damage.
Too late. Its aborted effort is your gain, strengthening your extraordinary guarantee’s credibility and giving weight to the idea that your firm not only claims to be, but actually is, the best. That’s competitive strength. CEOs should never forget that a strong payout is the linchpin of an extraordinary guarantee’s power.

The Payout Process:

So you offer a guarantee with a strong promise and a meaningful payout. Great—but not if customers find the payout process to be as enjoyable as passing kidney stones.
First, an extraordinary payout process needs to be proactive and empathetic.

At Hampton Inn, nothing impresses guests more than seeing their bills ripped in half when they mention a problem during checkout. Second, the payout process must communicate your intent to find and rectify the causes of customer problems—or they’ll assume that the problems will reoccur. Finally, you must reach out to customers when you have dealt with the causes of their problems. Thank them for providing valuable quality-improvement information, let them know what action you’ve taken, and give them a token of your appreciation.

Amazingly, this last step—reaching out to customers—rarely happens. When was the last time you received this kind of communication from a company? If you did, how would you feel? Now the killer: What would happen if your customers felt this way about your company? An extraordinary guarantee creates the opportunity to find out.

Ironically, whenever a company’s executives explore the extraordinary guarantee idea, someone makes the point, “If one of our good customers has a serious problem, we always end up doing what it takes to satisfy them anyway. Why do we put them through such torture?” Inevitably, a chorus of nods follows.

What are the chances of the same situation playing out in your company? Pretty high, I’ll wager. Over the years, protective layers build up that do nothing but waste resources and corrode customer loyalty. Simply exploring an extraordinary guarantee will bring this insidious problem to the surface and create an opportunity to slice through the web of counterproductive policies and procedures that rarely get any attention.

The Financial Case

Tom Raffio is the CEO of Northeast Delta Dental, which provides dental insurance to employers in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. Following is an excerpt from a letter he wrote to me:
“Much of our success is directly due to the quality culture created by our Extraordinary Guarantee. It has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of our company’s growth in subscriber base, customer retention, reserves and corporate reputation. Our ‘smooth conversion guarantee’ has been particularly instrumental in landing new corporate customers.

“The guarantee has been the catalyst for our process improvement efforts, ‘closing the holes in our hose’—an analogy I first heard from you [that we still use].”

The company credits its extraordinary guarantee for its ability to win the Granite State [Vermont] Best Place to Work Award four out of the first five years it was offered and, two years after entering national competition, be named the Best Small Company to Work for in America.

The improvements the extraordinary guarantee spawned have also enabled Northeast Delta Dental to charge prices 20 percent higher than those of the competitors, while simultaneously increasing its market share from less than 25 percent in 1995 to over 80 percent in 2006. Now that’s a financial case!

Christopher W. Hart, Ph.D., is an adjunct professor at Babson College and a former professor at Harvard Business School. He also is president of Spire Group (http://www.spiregroup.biz/), a management consulting and executive- education firm. His email address is chart@spiregroup.biz.

********************** end article *******************************************

Friday, August 10, 2007

Book Review: Blue Ocean Strategy

Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the
Competition Irrelevant
by W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne.


This review will focus on pointing out those things that are consistent with Theory of Constraints (TOC) and my opinions from those things that are not.

The authors have done a nice job of explaining the problems with current strategy and market development techniques. Specifically, I agree that:

  • "... with supply exceeding demand in more industries, competing for a share of contracting markets while necessary, will not be sufficient to sustain high performance." pg 5
  • "The result has been accelerated commoditization of products and services, increasing prices wars, and shrinking profit margins." pg 8
  • "In overcrowded industries, differentiating brands becomes harder in both economic upturns and downturns." pg 8
  • "The trend toward globalization has compounds the situation." pg 8

No question. There is a problem. We can't continue to do things in the same way and expect different results. However, I believe that a couple key assumptions have lead the authors astray.

Here is what I don't agree with:

  • "To seize new profit and growth opportunities, they need to create blue oceans." pg 5

Blue oceans are new products in new markets/industries and I believe that in many cases this is an invalid assumption -- that you MUST create new products and/or new markets/industries to substantially grow profits. I believe that this is invalid because we have experience in creating irresistible market offers that we call Mafia Offers. These Mafia Offers are typically for existing products in existing markets. The reason we focus our Mafia Offers develop on existing products in existing markets can be traced back to the 5 Focusing Steps that were discussed in The Goal by Eliyahu M Goldratt:

  1. IDENTIFY the system's constraint.
  2. Decide how to EXPLOIT the system's constraint.
  3. SUBORDINATE everything else to the above decision.
  4. ELEVATE the system's constraint.
  5. If in the previous step the constraint has been broken, go back to Step 1.

If your system's constraint is the market, then new products or new markets/industries is an ELEVATION step. I believe that before we elevate we should first try to get more (EXPLOIT and SUBORDINATE) out of what we already have.

The authors then address the risk associated with new products in new markets/industries:

  • A systematic process will minimize risk to expanding into new products and/or new markets/industries. I agree with this, but then they go on to imply that it would be no more than the risk of strategies around existing products/markets/industries.

I think the business owner who was investing in the new development would disagree.

In contrast, a good Theory of Constraints Mafia Offer will achieve all the positives of a blue ocean strategy without the risk. Because mafia offers are developed on existing products/markets/industries and with little or no investment, it is an EXPLOIT and SUBORDINATION step.

Okay, now back to more about what I liked:

  • If and when you need to develop new products/markets/industries then I think the process outlined by the authors is very good.

Almost everyone at some point WILL need to develop new products/markets/industries and I liked this approach. I do think it would be difficult to implement the approach just based on what's in the book. But the framework is there.

Here's to maximizing YOUR profits!

"Dr Lisa" Lang

(c)Copyright 2007, Dr Lisa, Inc. All rights reserved.

Need an example of a Mafia Offer? http://www.podcasternews.com/programs/87/better-process-podcast/3574/?A=1